I have a complicated relationship with the Seven Church Ages view of Revelation 2-3. What I've been doing lately is trying to develop my own modified form of it, that's almsot more of a genealogy then a Timeline, but also it's fluidity allows the eras to overlap. But I still consider any such view less important then the idea that at any time there are some Churches that fit all of these descriptions.
When I was most hostile to the idea I emphasized it as tied to a Western Bias in looking at Church History. And Thyatira being both the Roman Catholic and Medieval Church was vital to how I painted it that way But as a student of History I should have known better. The Catholic Church did impact the lands of The Bible during the Middle Ages, and that impact is still felt today.
One aspect of that is the Maronite Church which claims to have always been in Communion with Rome and is still the dominant form of Christianity in Lebanon.
However The Crusades are the bigger deal. Catholic Kingdoms ruled Jerusalem for nearly a Century and places like Cyprus, Acre and Antioch for longer. Then the Fourth Crusade had Latins take over much of the Eastern Empire's territory. The Cities of the Seven Churches themselves always remained part of the Greek Empire of Nicaea, but the Catholic Empire was near by. And then the Knights Hospiltars' rule of Rhodes gave them presence in the Eastern Mediterranean till after The Reformation started.
And since then the Maronites have become no longer the only Eastern Rite Catholic Church. The Melkite Greek Catholics are the majority of Christians in Modern Israel, and the Chaldean Catholic Church are the Majority of Christians in Iraq, something that should perhaps be considered more often in the Mystery Babylon and Papal Antichrist debates.
Protestants seeing Catholicism in this message tend to overlook the good things that are said about them. And indeed the good things said about Thyatira are the good things that can be said about Catholics even today. Maybe not the Church Hierarchy as an institution, but many individual Catholics and local Parishes do take seriously the Church's mandate to give to the poor and care for the sick better then most Protestants, especially in the modern U.S. who've gotten wrapped up in that Prosperity nonsense.
This Church getting the longest message is often used to justify it getting the longest time period in the Seven Ages view. While it has the longest message it's not half the total. The modified version I'm considering would begin the Thyatira era with Pope Gregory I and ends Pergamos's primacy with the Seventh Ecumenical Council in 787 and then begin Sardis with the preaching of John Ball and John Wycliff in the 1370s and ends Thyatira primacy with the death of Mary Queen of Scots. So it still has more of the timeline then anyone else.
It is the figure of Jezebel in the message who is the most enigmatic. With even speculation on the original 1st-2nd century local context being unsure what to make of her. Later Church history doesn't seem to associate any female Prophets false or otherwise with this city, the Montanists claimed their prophetic lineage from Philadelphia. Scholars even disagree on if the intent is to reference the Old Testament personage or if this was an individual literally named Jezebel.
The Anti-Paul cultists out there have from time to time thrown out the idea that this Jezebel is Lydia of Thyatira from Acts 16. There is no real evidence of that besides she's a woman linked to both this location and Paul and these people are determined to believe all the bad things said in these 2 chapters are directed at Paulian Christianity.
The association of this message with Protestant criticisms of Catholicism has often resulted in this Jezebel being associated with The Catholic view of Mary, sometimes specifically that this is referring to a Demonic Entity that is behind those Marian Apparitions. However I feel Jesus is definitely referring to a flesh and blood female Human claiming the office of Prophet. But eschatologically it could be applicable to multiple false Prophets who've filled this role over the ages.
Perhaps my most controversial Hot Take on the applicability of this prophecy is that maybe if Thyatira is Catholicism then Jezebel is Jeanne d'Arc? (Joan of Arc for uninformed Anglophones, I only got used to the proper pronunciation because of all the Anime she pops up in.)
I get annoyed every time Protestants try to claim her as some kind of Proto-Protestant (including one website I read on the Historicist view of Thyatira), she actually called for a Crusade agaisnt the Hussites, the actual Proto-Protestants of 15th Century Europe. She was in fact both religiously and politically conservative and even reactionary. In fact I don't think any woman living in 15th century Europe would be more hostile to modern Feminism. And again I don't think any of the talk of "Fornication" in this chapter or 17-18 is actually about Sex, the Greek word is a word for prostitution but in my view is here about spiritual whoredom, i.e. Idolatry. Catholic Idolatry was something Jeanne promoted in claiming specifically Catholic Saints talked to her in her visions.
But that is by no means my only or even main theory.
I think the reason people are confused by the name dropping of Jezebel is because we don't properly think of Old Testament Jezebel as someone claiming to be a Prophetess. But the role of Prophet Biblically is not just about giving predictive Prophecies or even for claiming to have directly communicated with God, it's being a forth teller of God's word. And there are in that case two types of false Prophets, those who attribute false words to the True God, and those who promote false gods. Jezebel was the chief False Prophet of her era because she was leading the propagation of Baal Worship.
The Prophetess of Isaiah 8 was in my opinion probably the wife of Uzziah and mother of Hezekiah. And while Biblically the word Prophetess is never used of her Jewish tradition does call David's Wife Abigail a Prophetess because she did Prophesy. That's two precedents for a Prophetess of YHWH being a Queen-Consort of the House of David, so the Queen-Consort of Ahab being his False Prophetess rhymes quite nicely.
My reading of Jezebel does have a bit in common with what I said of Jeanne d'Arc above. Even though she was a woman who held power, she and her daughter Athaliah I see as conservative women driven by a lot of internalized misogyny. So I am a bit annoyed that a certain famous Feminist website has named itself after her. I get it, they don't want to give The Bible the benefit of the doubt on Gender issues so see it as empowering to embrace a Biblical Villainess. But I do believe The Bible's historical narrative allows more nuance then people realize, that some Heroes aren't Lionized as unconditionally as we assume, and that some villains it is okay to emphasize or sympathize with. Jezebel and Athaliah are simply the worst to claim as Feminist icons, Delilah I actually like but what most people assume about her is also off. Even Athaliah would be better since she was a Queen-Regent and not another example of the trope of a woman wielding power because of who she's screwing or is related to, she even tried to massacre her own grandchildren to be rid of that pretense.
Back to Revelation chapter 2. Since the name itself is a point of contention, I decided to look at the Greek text. The Greek spelling is Iezabel. That spelling makes perfect sense to me as a Greek transliteration of the Hebrew Iyzebel. But I'm also struck by how much it resembles the Romance Language European names Isabel/Isabella and other variants.
The Wikipedia page for the name Isabel/Isabella says they are forms of Elizabeth. But that seems utterly ridiculous to me. As if Catholic Europe doesn't want to admit how often they've been unwittingly naming their daughters after one of The Bible's notorious villains.
The most famous Isabella is Isabelle of Aragon the first Queen of Spain, who the Catholic Church does highly revere, giving her the title "The Catholic". She hasn't been made a Saint yet, but remember Jeanne wasn't canonized till the 20th Century, it can take awhile. She died just before the Reformation but among her children and grandchildren were the fiercest Catholic political opponents of the Reformation, they include two Holy Roman Emperors and Bloody Mary.
However since I earlier defined this era as tied to the Seventh Ecumenical Council, perhaps I should look to figures who lived then. The sin of Jezebel in Revelation 2 is Iconophilia, which prevailed at this council.
Empress Irene was the major political force behind the Council. What's interesting is how much her biography resembles Athaliah rather then Jezebel. She was first a Queen-Consort, then Queen-Mother and then Queen-Regent, and was in the end overthrown by a Coup. But I suppose the only part that doesn't also apply to Jezebel is being an actual ruling Queen.
Update February 18th 2023:
I've argued earlier on this blog for Revelation being written during the reign of Hadrian. And it has now occurred to me that perhaps many Jews and Christians during that era saw Empress Pompeia Plotina, as a Jezebel figure. She was the wife of Trajan and by adoption Mother of Hadrian, she's the only Roman empress known to have been also deified in Egypt, and in Rome she was associated with Virgin Goddesses like Vesta and Minerva. She held the title of Augusta and there are coins depicting her, she lived until at least 121 AD so a few years into the reign of Hadrian, and she was deified in Rome after her death.
Update March 5th 2023:
I'm adding this update because I read Fred Harding's The Apocalypse Deception, I wrote a review of the Book on Amazon but it hasn't gone live yet, I find it interesting but have to reject it's main thesis which is that The Revelation is a Satanic False Prophecy. But it's relevant here because there is a whole sub chapter on Thyatira.
First I did mention above that some people read the text as saying this Woman was literally named Jezebel, however I always considered that unlikely and had pretty much ruled it out before I bought this book. But Harding is presuming there is no other reading in order to make Revelation seem nonsensical and ridiculous. This chapter of Revelation already established that Hebrew Bible names will come up symbolically.
The teachings of Jezebel are basically the same as what's called the Doctrine of Balaam in the message to Pergamos. But why use a different Biblical villain here when the text reused the name of Nicolaitans for a different doctrine? It's because of the different context, Pergamos was a center of the Imperial Cult so the imagery of Idolatrous Adultery with a Foreign Pagan King was mot potent there. In Thyatira the source of the Corruption is seemingly more internal, and the very name of Thyatira makes using a female symbolic figure who was a daughter of a Canaanite King poetically fitting.
Harding as a Hyper-Paulian asks why Jesus didn't just tell them to excommunicate this Jezebel, at which point I get confused because the entire Jezebel part of the message begins with Jesus saying "Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel", I really don't know what he thinks that sentence is saying other then "You need to excommunicate her".
He also claims there is no other evidence there ever was a Christian Community in Thyatira in the Pre-Nicene era, but claims this only of Thyatira of these seven which I find odd. Four of these cities are never explicitly mentioned (at least by this same name) elsewhere in The New Testament, Smyrna, Pergamos, Sardis and Philadelphia. Thyatira is missing from Polycrates letter on the Quartodeciman controversy but so are Pergamos and Philadelphia. As far as the lack of a documented line of Bishops, I think all of these traditional lines from Eusebius are exaggerated because he wanted to push Episcopal polity further back into history then it actually existed, Thyatira may have not had it precisely because it was the most Paulian and Paul intended Church government to be Congregational with Presbyterian characteristics, Episcopal Polity came from the Heretic Igantius. But the Traditional identification for Philadelphia doesn't have any known Bishops prior to the time of Constantine either.
Acts absolutely does depict Paul as visiting the general area of where Thyatira is but without naming specific cities on his third journey, and a native of Thyatira living in Philipi was converted previously. It's highly unlikely a Paulian community wasn't established here. Revelation 2 predicts Great Tribulation to fall on Jezebel and her followers in the near future, maybe those of the Thyatira Church who survived that simply moved elsewhere.
Also Lydia was a Merchant, that job required traveling, and we know independent of Acts 16 that Thyatira was important to the Trade of Purple during this period. So it doesn't mater that we're never explicitly told she had ever traveled back to her hometown, her job basically required her to do so regularly.
The Wikipedia page for Thyatira (titular see) mentions a second century Bishop named Carpus. And there was also a Bishop representing Thyatira at Nicaea I, Chalcedon and Nicaea II the Ionophilic Council.
By the Third Century the city was a stronghold of the Montanist sect (my source on that being Epiphaninius Adv Haer LI 33) which did involve prominent Prophetesses. Montanus was also said to have began his ministry in an unidentified town of Mysia, Thyatira I'd referred to above as Lydian but it was also arguably part of Mysia, sometimes placed right on the border between them. Maybe Montanus's claim to Prophetic succession from Amia of Philadelphia was a lie to obscure actually inheriting his prophetic lineage from the false prophetess of Thyatira? On the other hand the Montanists seem opposite to what Jezebel was teaching since they were proto-Donatists opposing letting the Lapsi back into the Church while "Jezebel" was basically saying it's okay to Lapse. Maybe they were a movement formed after the time of this "Jezebel" as a reaction going in many ways in the opposite direction? And of course people who like the Montanists could consider seeing them as those praised in the Message for not following Jezebel.
Speaking of the very concept of Prophetesses, Harding also in this part of the book engages in the typical Patriarchal abuse of 1 Timothy 2:12 which I've addressed in multiple posts on my other blog, Neither Male of Female and it's follow up, Women Pastors, ect and may address further in the future. But it's also amusing that's he's willing to engage in this criticism of the established Canon, including breaking down stylistic reasons Revelation can't share an author with the other books attributed to an author named John, but then builds so much of this argument on the most disputed Epistle of Paul.
I intend to make a future post on broader claims of incompatibility between Paul and Revelation in the future, I'll maybe say more on Harding then.
I do want to elaborate on why Thyatira has it's name. The city existed before Seleucus I Nicator but in 290 BC he renamed it to celebrate learning his wife had given birth to a Daughter. Seleucus was the successor of Alexander who initially specifically inherited just Babylonia, he conquered everything else from there. Meanwhile one of the names Thyatira is said to have had before this is Semiramis the Greek form of the name of an Assyrian Queen who Greek legendary histography exaggerated into being the founder of Babylon. Five verses of the Hebrew Bible refer to a "Daughter of Babylon", Psalm 137:8, Isaiah 47:1, Jeremiah 50:42, 51:33 and Zechariah 2:7. Some imagery of the discussion of Jezebel is repeated when discussing Mystery Babylon in chapter 17. So there could be a Poetic connection there.
Thyatira also may have been a city that was already Greek before the time of Alexander, I'm not sure if that means anything, but like Pergamon and Smyrna it would have been specifically an Aeolian colony.
It's also interesting that today Thyatira has a Catholic Titular See not a Greek Orthodox one when in general this is an historically Orthodox region.
John said he was in the Spirit on the Day of the LORD. Perhaps the reason it's difficult to parse who she was is because she wasn't "was" at all. The church ages view is without merit.
ReplyDeleteThe seven churches likely exist during the eschaton once more.
Antipas is likely a future martyr. Evidence on him is nothing but tradition rather than facts of his existence. I suspect he hasn't been martyred yet.
The End Times are not now, in my opinion. Everyone always wants it to be soon, but the world looks nothing like the Bible said it would.
With homosexuality not necessarily being a sin, and the fall of man impacting gender in some fashion, the common tropes of "but it has to be the end, look at all the gays" is ridiculous.
In any case, this Jezebel doesn't exist yet. Neither do the Nicolaitans or Antipas.
Notice the two witnesses are involved with the seven churches in their imagery in Zechariah.
They're eschatological, thus the churches will exist once more.
This is why Philadelphia will be kept from the Great Tribulation. Because it will literally exist.
I can't accept the ages view at all.