Alan Kurshner supports his position that the Eschatological Wrath of God is more then just the Seven Bowls by saying the word "Wrath" doesn't have to be used for the concept of "Wrath" to be in mind.
I do not disagree with that on it's own, after all the word "Parousia" isn't in Revelation at all but I strongly feel Revelation tells us when that happens by describing it's characteristics.
However my strong belief that we are not in Wrath during the first half of the book is based on more then just the rarity of the word itself popping up in the first 11 chapters. It's based on specifically what we are told when Wrath is explicitly mentioned.
After the Seventh Trumpet is sounded Revelation 11:18 says that His Wrath is Come, Wrath starting is an effect of which the Seventh Trumpet is a cause. The only time the word Wrath is used before the Seventh Trumpet is sounded is during the Sixth Seal events of Revelation chapter 6, but it's not any heavenly voice saying it there, it's the Kings of The Earth, not a credible source. Again see my post on the Non Signs.
A common explanation of the difference between Tribulation and Wrath is that "Tribulation is what Man does and Wrath is what God does". This definition is often promoted by Pre and Post Tirbbers, people who don't even consider such a distinction relevant to the timing of The Rapture.
Even if I partially agreed with that I would still say the events associated with the Seals and first 6 Trumpets are not directly God's doing the same way the Bowls are. After all events Pre-Wrathers place before the Rapture (the first 5 Seals) are just as arguably caused by God as the Trumpets are. In fact the seals being opened by the Lamb rather then Angels makes them if anything more directly God's doing.
But I don't agree with that definition, it isn't found in Scripture.
The doctrine that The Church won't be here during the Eschatological Day of The Lord's Wrath doesn't mean God inherently isn't judging the nations during the Church Age. For one thing there are passages definitely about what happened to Jerusalem in 70 AD that called it God's Wrath.
In fact the accounts of the Trumpets specifically refer to Believers being here, unlike the Bowls. No the 144 Thousand can't be interpreted as Post Rapture believers, they are described using clearly Church Specific terminology, like being the First Fruits. In Paul's Epistles being Sealed is itself a Church specific Promise, tied to our Promise that The Holy Spirit won't leave us.
There is no evidence of believers on Earth during the Bowls, in fact Chapters 14 and 15 seem to have us in heaven already. At best the first Bowl's account can be taken to imply there still exist people who didn't take the Mark. But unlike most Christians I don't think only Believers will refuse The Mark.
Or if there are Saints during the Bowls period they can't be proven to be the Church specifically the same way the 144 Thousand are. The people of God being told to come out of Babylon in the Wilderness is terrestrial Israel.
Biblically Trumpets are warnings. I'm to lazy to go and make that argument right now, but google it I'm confident you'll find many have proven that. The Trumpets are the warning signs we are supposed to be looking out for.
Also I will in the near future be making another post on how the removal of restraint refereed to in II Thessalonians 2 is the Fifth Trumpet in Revelation 9.
No comments:
Post a Comment