1 Maccabees 1:21-24 says Antiochus Epiphanes took from The Temple the Menorah, Altar of Incense, Table of Showbread and many other gold and silver vessels. And in verse 23 "also he took the hidden treasures which he found". None of this was ever returned or retrieved, Judas Maccabeus had new sacred vessels made in 1 Maccabees 4:47-49.
This isn't like accounts in The Canonical Bible where it's easy to say they would have specified the Ark if it was taken then. The books of Maccabees are not Scripture but official propaganda of the Hasmoneans, they may have wanted to hide The Ark also being taken, yet none the less included this cryptic statement about him taking "hidden treasures", what other "hidden treasures" could there be since all the other major sacred relics of The Temple were singled out in the prior verse?
Hidden Treasures is in plural, I talked in a prior post about the Rod of Aaron, Jar of Manna and Torah Scroll that were placed in the Ark by Moses but seemingly not there anymore when Solomon placed it in his Temple. Perhaps Solomon removed them to place them in a hidden chamber that would later wind up also hiding The Ark itself?
Antiochus most likely took them to Antioch, perhaps kept them in the royal palace on the island, or maybe put them somewhere in the Fourth Quarter which was his expansion of the city. The royal palace was later built over by a Church Constantine built, which itself was destroyed by several earthquakes and wars over the city's history.
Some Islamic Prophecies foretell that The Mahdi will discover the Ark of The Covenant and other Biblical treasures buried at Antioch. Back when I first read about that researching for my prior Mahdi posts I had no idea what theoretically could have brought them there because I had overlooked this detail of I Maccabees.
"The reason he is called the Mahdi (a.s.) is that he guides the way to a hidden thing. He will bring forth the Ark of the Covenant from a place known as Antioch." (Jalal-uddine AsSuyuti's Al-Urf Al-Wardi fi Akhbar Al-Mahdi, a part of Al-Hawi li Al-Fatawa)"He is called the Mahdi (a.s.) because he is the key to something nobody knows. He will bring forth the Ark of the Covenant from the Cave of Antioch." (Nuaim bin Hammad's book Kitab Al-Fitan) and (Ibn Hajar Haithami Al-Makki's book Al-Qawl al-Mukhtasar fi Alamat al-Mahdi al-Muntazar)Tamin Ad-Dari said " I said, 'O Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم , I have never seen a Roman city like the city of Antioch ( in Turkey, but historically, is part of Syria) and I have never seen more rain than it has.' Whereupon the Messenger of Allah, صلى الله عليه وسلم , said: 'Yes, that is because the Torah, Rod of Moses, Tablets (of the Ten Commandments), and the Table of Solomon, the son of David, (made of gold and ornamented with precious jewels, emeralds, pearls and rubies) are in its caves. There is not a single cloud that comes from any direction to it that does not pour its blessing in that valley. And the days and night will not pass until a man from my musked children live in it. His name is like my name and his father's name is like my father's name; his manners are like my manners. He will fill the world with fairness and justice just as it had been filled by harm and transgressions'." (Ibn Hibban's book Ad-Dua'fa and Shaykh Abdullah bin Sadek, Grand Muhaddith of Morocco, 's book Al-Mahdi, Jesus and Dajjal)Ka'b said: "The Mahdi ... excavates Tabout Al-Sakina (Ark of Covenant) from a cave in Antioch (in it, will be the Torah that Allah (t) revealed to Moses and the Gospel that Allah (t) revealed to Jesus..." (Nuaim bin Hammad's Kitab Al-Fitan)
Now I'm not one of those Islamic Antichrist theorists saying we should actually believe these Islamic Prophecies will come true (maybe the "antichrist" will be a Muslim claiming to be the Mahdi I'm undecided on those issues). Instead these Hadiths may have just recorded some Prophecies given after the fact. Perhaps referring to discoveries made by Caliph Umar who first captured Antioch for the Arab Empire, or later by Al-Mahdi (775-785). Or maybe they just come from Ancients who knew things now forgotten related to what I've theorized above. Maybe they descend from local beliefs the Christians of Antioch had in antiquity before Islam even emerged.
I think the Rod of Moses in this Hadiths may actually refer to the Rod of Aaron. And remember The Ark also had an early Torah Scroll in it
Being in a Cave perhaps fits the Fourth Quarter, which from the map I looked at seems to include some hills and mountains which could possibly have caves.
This post's title is kind of semi click-bait. While I do think it's possible the Ark was among what Antiochus Epiphanes took, just the fact that he definitely did take the Menorah, Altar and Table of Showbread built by Solomon (the Mosaic ones were never in The Temple) is itself really significant. I suspect what one of those Hadiths refereed to as the Table of Solomon was really originally Solomon's Table of Showbread.
Antioch is where Believers were first called Christians in Acts, treasures of Solomon's Temple being there during the New Testament era when the city became a major Capital of the True Temple of God is very interesting.
If an early text of one of The Gospels wound up with these treasures, my first hunch is it's Mark's. Acts 13 implies John Mark was also in Antioch when Paul and Barnabas left on their first journey from there, Chuck Missler argued Mark's Gospel was already written by that time based on what the Greek text calls Mark. And we know Peter spent time in Antioch as well from Galatians, Mark's Gospel was according to tradition him writing down what Peter had preached. Still the association of the Nazarenes with this region makes it not impossible a copy of Hebrew Matthew wound up in Antioch, and Hebrew Matthew being what early Muslim sources meant by the original Injil fits some theories I've had about the origins of Islam. However I can't entirely rule out any of them.
Another note, the person Muslim Tradition remembers as Habib'i Neccar/Habib Al-Najjar is probably Simeon called Niger of Acts 13 in my opinion.
A Muslim scholar named Ibn Hazm of Cordoba (994-1064) claimed that Mark wrote "His Gospel in Greek at Antioch". Ephrem the Syrian seems to have claimed John's Gospel was written at Antioch in his commentary on the Diatessaron, but remember Mark was also named John so there could be confusion there.
Being in a Cave perhaps fits the Fourth Quarter, which from the map I looked at seems to include some hills and mountains which could possibly have caves.
This post's title is kind of semi click-bait. While I do think it's possible the Ark was among what Antiochus Epiphanes took, just the fact that he definitely did take the Menorah, Altar and Table of Showbread built by Solomon (the Mosaic ones were never in The Temple) is itself really significant. I suspect what one of those Hadiths refereed to as the Table of Solomon was really originally Solomon's Table of Showbread.
Antioch is where Believers were first called Christians in Acts, treasures of Solomon's Temple being there during the New Testament era when the city became a major Capital of the True Temple of God is very interesting.
If an early text of one of The Gospels wound up with these treasures, my first hunch is it's Mark's. Acts 13 implies John Mark was also in Antioch when Paul and Barnabas left on their first journey from there, Chuck Missler argued Mark's Gospel was already written by that time based on what the Greek text calls Mark. And we know Peter spent time in Antioch as well from Galatians, Mark's Gospel was according to tradition him writing down what Peter had preached. Still the association of the Nazarenes with this region makes it not impossible a copy of Hebrew Matthew wound up in Antioch, and Hebrew Matthew being what early Muslim sources meant by the original Injil fits some theories I've had about the origins of Islam. However I can't entirely rule out any of them.
Another note, the person Muslim Tradition remembers as Habib'i Neccar/Habib Al-Najjar is probably Simeon called Niger of Acts 13 in my opinion.
A Muslim scholar named Ibn Hazm of Cordoba (994-1064) claimed that Mark wrote "His Gospel in Greek at Antioch". Ephrem the Syrian seems to have claimed John's Gospel was written at Antioch in his commentary on the Diatessaron, but remember Mark was also named John so there could be confusion there.
However if these prophecies are going to be taken advantage of by a Muslim Anticrhist's End Times deception, then what they may produce claiming to be the original Gospel might actually be an Ebionite version of Matthew, since the Ebionite view of Jesus is very similar to the Islamic view.
No comments:
Post a Comment