I firmly believe in the doctrine of duel fulfillments. So no I'm not going to deny that this is in some way applicable to Isaiah's own time in the reign of King Ahaz, when the Northern Kingdom and Aram Damascus were allied against Judah.
I'll even agree that the Prophetess who becomes Pregnant in Isaiah 8 is a lesser near fulfillment of the Almah mentioned in Isaiah 7:14.
One thing I've seen is that some people think this Prophetess is Isaiah's wife. It's difficult to know for sure, but I've generally more leaned towards the idea that this child in question is Hezekiah and the Prophetess is Abijah also called Abi his mother. And so the Zechariah who is Abijah's father is the same as Zechariah son of Jeberechiah mentioned in Isaiah 8:2.
I think the basis for interpreting her as Isaiah's wife is taking the language of 8:3 as literally saying Isaiah fathered the child. But I don't think that is the intent here. It could be Isaiah's personal role in this first fulfillment is played in The Nativity narrative by Simeon or Anna in Luke 2.
My hunch is this Prophetess Office was directly inherited from that held by both Deborah and Miriam the Sister of Moses. Thus backing up aspects of what I argued in the Almah post about the significance of Miriam being called an Almah. And at the time of the Birth of Christ this Prophetess was Anna of Luke's Gospel.
Maybe at some point it became standard for this Prophetess to be among the wives of The King. Like the ceremonial marriage between King and Priestess many pagan cultures had. The Marriage between Jehoram's daughter Jehosheba and the Priest Jehoiada may have been a similar arrangement, a marriage alliance between the Royal family and the Priesthood.
Isaiah 8:14 is terminology drawn on by Paul (Romans 9:32-33, 11:9 and 1 Corinthians 1:23) as well as 1 Peter 2:8-10. So quoting this promised Son as being Jesus was not unique to Matthew.
The key objection many might have to applying this prophecy all the way into Isaiah 8 to the time of Jesus birth is what's said in Isaiah 8:4.
For before the child shall have knowledge to cry, "My father", and "my mother", the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria shall be taken away before the king of Assyria.I have argued that King Herod died during the 40 days between Jesus Birth and Presentation in The Temple. After he died rebellions broke out in the lands Herod ruled, which did extend to include parts of Old Testament Aram. And these were put down by Varus when he was governor of Roman Syria. I don't think it's that hard to typologically say Rome is in the role of Assyria here. Especially the Roman Province of Syria which was basically what the Seleucid Empire had declined to.
Josephus talks in-depth about these campaigns. One battle is clearly placed in the general area of Samaria.