The Woman of Revelation 12 is Israel, and verses 6 and 14 refer to her hiding in the Wilderness in a place prepared by God.
Matthew 14 also records Jesus warning to flee to the Wilderness when you see The Abomination of Desolation.
What I have come to disagree with is the popular view that this hiding place is in the land anciently ruled by Edom but today part of Jordan, Biblically identified with Bozrah, though for some reason popularly identified with the distinct Petra.
Daniel 11:41 is taken as assurance that Edom, Moab and at least part of Ammon (all in modern Jordan) will escape The Antichrist. But I've already shown that Prophecy was about Caesar Augustus, and refers to those lands being ruled by the Nabatean kingdom of Aretas. And even if it does have a second fulfillment, this passage still doesn't directly connect itself to this doctrine, and that lack of control is not guaranteed to be permanent, Rome did eventually conquer the Nabatean Kingdom under Trajan, the same Caesar who conquered Babylon for Rome interestingly.
The main basis for placing their hiding place in Bozrah is Micah 2:12.
I will surely assemble, O Jacob, all of thee; I will surely gather the remnant of Israel; I will put them together as the sheep of Bozrah, as the flock in the midst of their fold: they shall make great noise by reason of the multitude of men.Thing is Bozrah is also a Hebrew term that means Sheepfold, and in context it looks like that is what's being said here, not a place name. There are no near by references to Edom or other Edomite place names to verify this being the Edomite city. And to further complicate things Jeremiah 48:24 refers to a Bozrah in Moab.
Amos 1:12 and Isaiah 34 refers to Bozrah specifically and Edom as a whole as being subject to God's Wrath during the Day of Warth. Now I think that is arguably about Eschatological Edom being Rome/The West, but I think the geographical lands of Ancient Edom could play a role in that, Edom returning to their roots in a sense, not unlike Mystery Babylon returning to Shinar in Zechariah 5.
The final passage cited to prove this theory is Isaiah 63 where Jesus, described similarly to how he is in Revelation 19, is coming from Edom and Bozrah. This passage also doesn't directly connect itself to the Wilderness hiding place doctrine but I think it's more likely to be relevant then Daniel.
It could be Jesus is traveling through Edom/Bozrah and it's neither the starting or ending point. However it certainly is not the ending point, so this theory is dependent on saying he goes where Israel is hiding first and then marches to Armageddon.
I however think based on Genesis 28:17 that when Revelation 19:11 says Heaven Opened, that opening is in Beth-El. Destroying The Armies of The Beast is the first thing Jesus will do, then he'll go to Israel to lead them back to Jerusalem.
So I think the reference to Edom and Bozrah in Isaiah 63 is the same as in Isaiah 34 and other Prophecies about Edom's final Judgment, like Obadiah, of Ezekiel 35-36.
So where do I think Israel will be protected?
I have argued before for seeing the Day of Yahuah as being a typological repeat of much of the history of The Exodus. In that context I think perhaps this will be the same place they wandered in The Wilderness for 40 years in the days of Moses. In fact I think the reference to her being fed there in 12:6 possibly alludes to a return of the Manna miracle. Also Exodus 19:4 uses Eagles' Wings terminology, as does Isaiah 40:31.
We do also see a pattern throughout The Bible of individuals returning to this same location. David spent some time in Paran which is also a place Israel spent some of the 40 year wandering. Elijah spent some time at Mt Sinai. We're never told where Jesus 40 days in the Wilderness was. Paul in Galatians 1:17 says he was in Arabia for some of the time between his conversion and the beginning of his ministry. Paul places Sinai in Arabia in Galatians 4:24-25.
That of course leads to debates about where those locations are.
I believe Mt Sinai is in Midian, possibly Jabal El Lawz, a view first popularized in The West by Ron Wyatt but later verified by the more reliable and trustworthy Bob Cornuke.
I've expressed in the past a willingness to believe certain Muslim claims that most modern Western Christians are adverse to. Doesn't change my complete rejection of the Theology, Christolgoy and Soterology of Islam, or that Muhammad is not eligible to be a Biblical Prophet. These issues come up in any post I give the Ishmael label to.
The Mt Sinai debate ties into that. If Sinai is in what we today call the Sinai Peninsula then the Desert of Paran can't be in Arabia either, since Paran is also one of the locations mentioned during the 40 year wandering.
We're used to thinking of the total geography of the 40 year wandering as pretty small because The West since the time of Constantine has been forced to limit it to the Sinai Peninsula. But once you place Mt Sinai in Arabia, then things can open up.
I want to point out that the Islamic view of Paran is not that it's just Mecca, they view the Wilderness of Paran as the entire Hijaz, that's pretty much all of Saudi Arabia that borders the Red Sea. But there is also a more specific Mt Paran.
Eusebius and Jerome were Pre-Islamic non Arab Christians who placed Paran in Arabia Desertia, which is the Roman name for Saudi Arabia basically, south of Nabatea (Jordan mostly) and north of Arabia Felix (Yemen).
There are Samaritan sources like some texts of their Pentateuch and their apocryphal Book of Moses that seem to agree with identifying Paran with al-Hijaz and linking Ishmael to Mecca. However a claim that Abraham built the Kaaba remains incompatible with Genesis.
Immanuel Velikvosky when arguing for his view of the Amalekites (which I agree with, with some qualifiers) in Ages in Chaos saw identifying Paran with al-Hijaz as supporting his theory based on his use of Arab Historians.
I'm even willing to consider valid the identification of the Baca of Psalm 84:6 with Bakkah an ancient name for Mecca. Though that is pretty difficult to prove.
In context it does sound like a Desert or Wilderness location, I'm even wondering now if Psalm 84 could be directly applicable to Israel's End Times wildness protection.
Psalm 84 being a Davdic Psalm is taken as meaning it's probably a location linked to a place David was during his exile. Well 1 Samuel 25:1 says David went to Paran after Samuel died.
The usage of Psalm 82 by Islamic apologists remains wrong in that Baca is not the destination of this Pilgrimage. They basically try to argue Zion just means Sacred Land and thus can mean the Kaaba. Zion only came to mean that after David placed his Tabernacle on Mt Zion, this being a Daivdic Psalm shows David's Zion is what he meant. While he was in Paran he longed to return to Zion.
If you take the size of New Jerusalem in Revelation 21-22, and place it's center at Jerusalem or Beth-El, it's total land would include Mecca and Medina, and one or two of it's southern gates would be just south of them in Arabia. So you could have people pilgrimage through those gates and past Mecca towards Zion.
So basically I think Arabia, not Jordan is where Israel will be protected during the last 1260 days.
Or maybe this and the Petra view don't conflict, since another suggested location for Mt Sinai is Jabel al-Madhbah near Petra. Petra isn't named as such in the Bible being a Greek name and the city as we know it from the Greco-Roman period. It was the Nabatean capital making it actually Ishmaelite territory just outside of Edom. But again during the NT era the Nabateans ruled Edom, Moab and much of Amon. But being connected to Ishmael's oldest son makes it logical to be near Paran.
It is named in The Bible as Cela/Sela/Selah, often translated Rock. Possibly first being given that name in 1 Samuel 23:25-28. And having being given another name in 2 Kings 14:7. It's refereed to in Obadiah 3 and Jeremiah 49:16. Showing at times Edom did have it. But it's linked to Kedar in Isaiah 42:11. And it identified as being in The Wilderness in Isaiah 16:1.
It is used of the Rock Moses smote the second time, when smiting it wasn't what he was supposed to do, in Numbers 20, and mentioned in Psalm 78:16. And it's used in Number 24:21 about the Kenites, the clan of the Father in-law of Moses. And in Deuteronomy 32:13. It's also possibly being mentioned in Judges 1:36.